No More Coal Plants in Germany

germancoal

Remember that item from Fox News a few weeks ago? Germany is doing well with solar energy because they have way more sun than we do!”

Another piece of the anti-renewable disinformation campaign commonly heard, and just as accurate, is something like: “Germany has had to increase reliance on coal because renewables are so unreliable.”

It is vitally important for the windbagger/anti-renewable crowd to cover-up, tear down, distort or distract from the example that Germany, Denmark, and other countries are setting for the world – maintaining world class manufacturing, exporting, and living standards, while switching to renewable power – so expect to see a lot of this in the future.

Fortunately, we have the reporting of Craig Morris at renewablesinternational.net to keep us oriented x 4.

In a PDF published last month, consultants from Pöyry tell the UK’s Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) not to expect any more coal plant projects after the current ones are completed.

Over the past two years, Renewables International has repeatedly argued that there will be no shift to coal power as a result of the nuclear phaseout. So it’s nice to see that other independent analysts see things the same way.

In their presentation to the UK government (PDF), researchers at Pöyry say there are three main reasons for the “apparent surge” in new coal plant construction, which is “due to highly unusual historic reasons”: a favorable market environment in 2007/2008; excess carbon allowances; and an “inability or reluctance of developers to cancel projects” when circumstances changed.

I had already written about the first two and am pleased to hear someone argue the third point. But going forward, the researchers say “there will be no major new unabated coal or date night projects in Germany for the foreseeable future beyond those currently under construction.”

Starting in 2009, the experts find that “developers’ appetites” for new coal projects has died down significantly so that there will be no further investment in coal plants “in this decade.” By 2035 (see chart above), installed coal power generating capacity will have fallen from around 42 GW to around 15 GW – and again, that installed capacity is likely to be running at lower utilization levels.

Is Germany Switching to Coal? Morris pointed out last December:

Opponents of renewables in North America are pouncing on the news of a new coal plant in Germany, especially because German Environmental Minister Peter Altmaier cut the ribbon, so to speak. Altmaier said Germany will need the conventional fossil power plants for “decades to come,” though he did not say it was, as Fox Business put it, to “complement unreliable and intermittent renewable energies such as wind and solar power.” In fact, he stated that “fossil energy and renewables should not be played as cards against each other” and that we have to move beyond “making enemies of the two.”

It took six years to build the plant, meaning that the process started in 2006. It is by no means a reaction to the nuclear phaseout of 2011. And as Altmaier himself points out, the new plant can ramp up and down by 150 megawatts within five minutes and by 500 megawatts within 15, making it a flexible complement to intermittant renewables. In the area, 12 coal plants more than 40 years old have been decommissioned, and the new 2,200 megawatt plant is to directly replace 16 older 150 megawatts blocks by the end of this year, so 2,200 megawatts of new, more flexible, somewhat cleaner capacity (the new plant has an efficiency of 43 percent, whereas 35 percent would be considered ambitious for most old coal plants) is directly replacing 2,400 old megawatts.

Germany has a target of 35 percent renewable power by 2020, rising to 85 percent by 2050 – meaning that 65 percent of its power supply will be conventional in 2020, and the country will still have 15 percent conventional power by mid-century. Obviously, Germany needs to build some new conventional power plants to reach even that ambitious goal for renewables.

There have been reports that Germany plans to construct some 23 coal plants, but as in Cologne these plans predate the nuclear phaseout of 2011. The question is how many of these will be built. German environmental organization BUND has a map (in German) of the power plants planned and those already blocked

In addition, Germany’s Energy Agency (Dena), which is not considered a blind advocate of renewables (on the contrary, the renewables sector considered its Grid Studies subservient to grid operators’ needs), estimates in a recent study (PDF in German) that 18.5 gigawatts of coal power capacity (both hard coal and brown coal) will be decommissioned by 2020, whereas only 11.3 gigawatts will be newly installed by that time. Most of the new capacity is expected to be gas turbines, with 20.7 gigawatts going up by 2020.

Europe’s Coal: The End is Nigh:

Renewables International has already put the current construction of coal plants in Germany into perspective. Essentially, the coal plants now going up were planned between 2005/2008 and therefore have nothing to do with the unnecessarily sudden nuclear phase-out of 2011 – and everything to do with the poor beginning of emissions trading in Europe during those years.

Now, the unpublished ECF briefing provided to Renewables International confirms these findings for the EU as a whole. Over the past two decades, coal consumption is not only down considerably in Germany, but also throughout the EU.

In early 2008, an astonishing 112 coal plants had been newly announced, but ground has only been broken on two of them (in Poland and Slovenia), with 73 having been abandoned and one under construction but in limbo (EDF wants the French and Polish governments to provide subsidies); the remaining 36 are still “announced” or “planned.” Of the 20 plants already under construction in early 2008, 14 have since been built, five are still entangled in courts, and one was switched to natural gas.

I’ll be updating this regularly. The renewable revolution in Europe continues unabated, and remains the best example for what we could be doing in the US, given the right policy initiatives.

Do I have to explain that the countries who run themselves on free energy will have a competitive advantage going forward?

15 thoughts on “No More Coal Plants in Germany”


  1. I moved last autumn to Germany from Sweden. Although old fashioned in regards of It-usage and management, the German people have my deepest respects for going through with Energiewende. It’s not well liked by all, and there is a debate around rising electricity prices, but it’s happening and it is future around the corner.

    They keep building railway to improve sustainable transportation and I would say they have more people-friendly system for recycling (everything except paper in one bag, mechanial separation) than Sweden. But it is a big country with many fossile fueled cars and a long way to go.

    The lack of water energy is also problematic as this is a redundance power that, like coal, can switch up and down rather fast to compliment wind and sun. Larger energy transportation nets will help compensate for this.


  2. Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!

    Can’t think offhand of a MORE important story.

    Renewable Energy

    Amory Lovins style efficiency

    “soft” Geoengineering (eg Mangrove Forests)

    And THEN if, necessary, solar radiation management.

    Hope in the face of despair.


  3. In Germany the coal plants have become energy exporter, thus Germany has become an exporting energy nation with the ongoing “Energiewende”.


  4. and in investing news:

    1) solar keeps getting cheaper and is reaching parity because other energy keeps getting more expensive (see link and snip below).

    2) investors call out negative article on Solar City on investment website (see comments section, where reality droppers destroy the article):

    http://seekingalpha.com/article/1434981-don-t-fall-for-the-hype-on-solarcity

    ——————————————————————————————————-
    http://etfdailynews.com/2013/05/09/is-the-surge-in-solar-stocks-sustainable/

    “Solar also has been moving out of the realm of a subsidized energy to one that could become market competitive. Last month, Deutsche Bank issued a report – the fourth of its kind – which suggested that solar may reach grid parity as early as the first quarter of next year.

    If ever there was a Holy Grail in the business, this is it.

    Reaching grid parity essentially means that a source of energy is at about the same price as competing sources. Solar for some time has been criticized as being too expensive relative to other energies. Without continuing government subsidies, this argument runs, it would not be able to survive in the market.

    Some residential subsidies survive, but the largest for new projects expired in the U.S. and the European Union at the end of last December. The strain on share prices in the first quarter of this year was a clear reminder of the end of such support.

    Then there was an unexpected development: In several parts of the world, conventional electrical generation became more expensive for a range of reasons while the effective cost of solar was coming down.

    Before the end of last year, solar reached grid parity in Hawaii, and it’s on track to accomplish the same before the end of this year in Italy, Australia, and Brazil.

    Depending on how one reads loads and distribution, there are claims that grid parity may occur for California (or at least parts of the state) in 2014.

    Additionally, proponents of solar also point out that, factoring in “external” costs – especially those to the environment – solar is already at grid parity in most of the United States.

    Should we then begin to look seriously at solar as a growth area for investment profit? Are these stocks finally going to be moving up on a regular basis?”


  5. I think it’s wonderful that Germany has been able to meet the short fall in electricity generation left from the closure of the nuclear plants without increasing it’s coal. Kudos to their commitment to energy conservation and renewable energy. But, if Germany could shut down seven base-load power stations without effecting supply, why didn’t they make them coal plants?

    A headline that reads “No more coal plants” is much less impressive than one that reads “Seven less coal plants”. After all claiming “No more coal” (the same amount of coal as always) is about as ho hum as claiming BAU.

    Why don’t we reopen the non-carbon emitting nuclear plants (NP) and immediately close seven coal plants instead. Then we can continue to replace fossil fuel pants (FFP) with renewable energy and once the FFPs are all replaced we can move to replacing the NPs with renewables.

    Surely, Germany can’t imagine nuclear power is more dangerous than fossil fuels. What about climate change? Germany needs to get it’s priorities straight – first replace the fossil fuel plants, then worry about nuclear power.


    1. One can imagine that a less precipitous exit from nuclear could have been engineered, but its hard to criticize the Germans for leading the world as they have.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from This is Not Cool

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading