I get some of my best compliments from climate deniers, actually.
Last year it was Neo-nazi not-so Breitbart, taking exception to my vid that fried Senator Cruz’s climate denial. Writer James Delingpole allowed “..The video is well produced and cleverly constructed – designed to look measured and reasonable”-
I couldn’t have said it better myself. That is my process, Jimmy.
Now comes the right-wing fossil fuel shill Cato Institute, who apparently thought it made sense to leap to the defense of a cartoon with a comically bad piece by long discredited denialist for hire Ross McKitrick, a right wing boob and purported economist with no climate science background. Good choice!
On the plus side, Mckitrick gives the devil (me) his due:
“The video is full of impressive-looking scientists talking about charts and data and whatnot. It probably cost a lot to make and certainly involved a lot of time and effort.”
Well, I’ll just say, cleverly designed to look like it cost a lot.
If you haven’t seen the video, the very first line, from atmospheric expert Andrew Dessler, is “….the people who know the least about climate science are the ones most fixated on models.” Cato/McKitrick set about to prove just that, once again.
Ross McKitrick for Cato Institute:
Fine, let’s go to the 2:38 mark and watch someone named Sarah Myhre tell us what this inarguable science says.
“It’s irrefutable evidence that there are major consequences that come with climate warming, and that we take these Earth systems to be very stable, we take them for granted, and they’re not stable, they’re deeply unstable when you perturb the carbon system in the atmosphere.”
How does she know this? From models of course.
Well, yeah, that, and 200 years of physics, plus 4 billion years of earth history that tells us most of what we know about how the earth responds to greenhouse gases.

By the way, “..someone named Sarah Myhre” is a PhD paleoecologist/paleoclimatologist
– in other words, someone with a PhD’s worth more training in the field than Mr. McKitrick, but who, because she’s a woman, he feels he can diss. Classy.
Mckitrick’s point seems to be that saying deniers are overly fixated on models is a “straw man”. He then goes on paragraph after paragraph fixating on … models.
Key point of the video comes when Ben Santer explains that the observations we now have are unexplainable by natural causes. Most notably, tho not in the scope of this vid due to time constraints, are the changes in the vertical structure of the atmosphere, i.e. warming low down, cooling up high, which are ONLY possible in a world where human released greenhouse gases are changing the atmospheres radiative profile.
(Anyone with any doubts about how well the models have performed should watch another piece from a few months ago.) Continue reading “Dilbert Defenders Double Down”










