DOGE Targets National Weather Service – What Could Go Wrong?

The Trump administration and its fossil fuel funders do NOT want you to know what is happening in the atmosphere.

According to Mathew Cappucci below, more than 50 percent of National Weather service offices were already understaffed. Now more cuts, big cuts, coming.
For Project 2025, what happens to farmers, coastal cities, or air travelers is just collateral damage, an “externality”.

So who cares?

Associated Press:

 Hundreds of weather forecasters and other federal National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration employees on probationary status were fired Thursday, lawmakers and weather experts said.

Federal workers who were not let go said the afternoon layoffs included meteorologists who do crucial local forecasts in National Weather Service offices across the country.

Cuts at NOAA appeared to be happening in two rounds, one of 500 and one of 800, said Craig McLean, a former NOAA chief scientist who said he got the information from someone with first-hand knowledge. That’s about 10% of NOAA’s workforce. 

The first round of cuts were probationary employees, McLean said. There are about 375 probationary employees in the National Weather Service — where day-to-day forecasting and hazard warning is done.

The firings come amid efforts by billionaire Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency to shrink a federal workforce that President Donald Trump has called bloated and sloppy. Thousands of probationary employees across the government have already been fired.

Rep. Grace Meng, D-N.Y., released a statement saying: “Today, hundreds of employees at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), including weather forecasters at the National Weather Service (NWS), were given termination notices for no good reason. This is unconscionable.”

Meng added: “These are dedicated, hardworking Americans whose efforts help save lives and property from the devastating impacts of natural disasters across the country. This action will only endanger American lives going forward.”

Rep. Jared Huffman, a California Democrat who is the ranking minority member in the House Natural Resources Committee, also said “hundreds of scientists and experts at NOAA” were let go.

Daniel Swain, a climate scientist at the University of California, Los Angeles, said on social media that the job cuts “are spectacularly short-sighted, and ultimately will deal a major self-inflicted wound to the public safety of Americans and the resiliency of the American economy to weather and climate-related disasters.”

Don’t take a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.

6 thoughts on “DOGE Targets National Weather Service – What Could Go Wrong?”


  1. It’s kinda pointless to comment on this stuff. It’s so stupid it goes without saying.

    In any organization, if you cut all the new employees, it’s not just the immediate effect of straining all the still-employed, but it will create major problems in the future when older employees retire or switch out.

    Perhaps the dumbest is the justification that this will somehow save the country from our national debt issues. Federal employee compensation is something like 6.6% of the budget. The 10% cuts are less that 1% of the budget, and that’s best case, because newer employees are paid less and there are sure to be departments the Trump Administration likes that won’t face any cuts.

    And then, all of this BS surface tweaking on U.S. spending, which gets a lot of news but has almost no effect on spending, will serve as the justification for massive tax cuts, mostly to the wealthy, which will balloon the debt:
    https://www.cbpp.org/research/federal-budget/house-republican-budgets-45-trillion-tax-cut-doubles-down-on-costly

    Musk even floats populist idea to cut American’s check for the savings in cutting the federal workforce. Exactly how that helps the debt is unanswered.


    1. This is related – an unexpected consequence that perhaps should have been expected:
      https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/28/politics/us-intel-russia-china-attempt-recruit-disgruntled-federal-employees/index.html

      Perhaps, though, even with cuts in the CIA and intelligence departments they’ll be able to cut off any problems there, assuming they’re led by someone vigilant. Wait a mo’:
      https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/tulsi-gabbard-russian-state-media-nomination-compromised-1235193119/


      1. We do not need intelligence offices in the federal government to watch what’s going on in other countries anymore. President Trusk&Co. are busy handing over state secrets to Russia and international domination to China and never pay attention to informed professional opinions anyway.


  2. Just give the President a sharpie – he’s pretty good at telling hurricanes which way they should go …

Leave a Reply to John O'NeillCancel reply

Discover more from This is Not Cool

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading