Betting on Renewables To Make the Electric Industry’s Google

If you have not read the piece right below this one, maybe do that first.

Above, “Mad Money” interview with David Crane, CEO of NRG, one of the nation’s largest electricity producers.  Crane is considered a forward leaning visionary in the normally gray and hidebound utility space.  While taking an aggressive posture in renewable development, planning for a 90 percent reduction in carbon pollution by 2050 – Crane still imagines that fossil fuels will play a role in mid-century.

I predict in 5 years he’ll be mainstream. In 10, he’ll look conservative.

Joe Nocera in the New York Times:

NRG, Crane told an audience at the Aspen Ideas Festival this summer, is the country’s fourth-largest polluter. “We emit 60 or 70 million tons of carbon into the atmosphere each year,” he said, mainly because a third of its power is generated by coal-fired plants. “I’m not apologetic about that because, right now, owning those plants and operating those plants are critical to keeping the lights on in the United States.”

But then he quickly added, “We have to move away from that.” And he has, reducing the company’s carbon footprint by 40 percent in the decade that he’s run the company. And, on Thursday, as The Times reported, he committed NRG to reducing its carbon emissions by 50 percent by 2030 and 90 percent by 2050.

These are terribly ambitious goals, but Crane is not some pie-in-the-sky dreamer. Although he sees climate change as an “intergenerational issue” — a way of ensuring the future for our children and grandchildren — he is also a pragmatic man running a publicly traded company. He firmly believes that the technology exists to make his ambitious goals possible, and that the real problem is the refusal of the rest of the power industry to adapt and change.

Crane likes to say that when he first started hearing about carbon emissions, he didn’t view it all that seriously. “To be frank,” he said in that same Aspen presentation, “I thought this is just the next pollutant that we have to deal with.” But once he got religion — and realized, as he put it, that power producers like NRG are “the biggest part of the problem” — he was determined to make his company a leader in reducing carbon.

More “Mad Money” – an inteview with First Solar Executive James Hughes:

5 thoughts on “Betting on Renewables To Make the Electric Industry’s Google”


  1. I wish David Crane and NRG well, although I do have my doubts. NRG seems to be putting its eggs in the CCS basket, about which there are still large unanswered questions. How expensive is it? How susceptible is stored CO2 to leakage? Will there be enough storage space available, over the lifetime of the plant, and indeed over the life of civilization?


    1. Here in Australia our largest mining conglomerate BHP has decided that if the science of CCS can’t be demonstrated in the next few years they will be forced to alter their mix of operations in response to the decline in demand that is coming from our largest markets, China and India. Naturally they look at it from a purely profit driven motive and deny any corporate responsibility to the health of the planet but I guess its a start.

      http://www.smh.com.au/business/mining-and-resources/green-horizon-may-force-bhp-to-quit-coal-says-andrew-mackenzie-20141125-11t74d.html


    2. IMO (and I am nothing if not opinionated), CCS is a good idea (on the surface) that is ultimately unworkable for many reasons. It is used as a “bright-sided” distraction by the fossil fuel interests so that they can continue BAU and accumulate their dirty riches a while longer. When the Great Disruption and the Great Awakening occur, CCS may be one of the emergency measures we are forced to use, but that’s it—-we simply need to stop producing CO2 and stop looking for carpets to sweep it under.

Leave a Reply to dumboldguyCancel reply

Discover more from This is Not Cool

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading