Klein: Can Climate and Capitalism CoExist?

Naomi Klein has a new book, This Changes Everything, which I have not yet read – but which has gotten a lot of ink, in particular for its supposed theme that capitalism is somehow incompatible with a healthy climate. I’m told that this is not a fair reading of the book, and in the interview above, Klein seems to target a particularly virulent, Koch Brothers, John Birch Society version of capitalism in which any regulations or limits on corporate power are considered violations of “freedom”.

That said, the book trailer, below, seems designed to play into the worst fears and stereotypes of the Fox News crowd, with lots of scary non-caucasions doing scary things, like walking around, talking, linking arms, dancing and drumming and stuff.

Chicago Tribune:

In other words, the root of the carbon problem is capitalism, says Klein. Or at least the kind of unfettered, absolutist “disaster capitalism” that was the target of her previous effort, “The Shock Doctrine.” In that sense, the aptly titled “This Changes Everything” might be seen as the third volume in Klein’s controversial and thoroughly researched challenge to neoliberal ideology.

The essence of her argument is that taking on climate change is a fleeting opportunity to right structural wrongs in political and socioeconomic systems that have stood largely unchallenged for decades. Given the problem’s size, Klein says, the only way forward is radical change. So the political right’s willingness to sow doubt about long-settled science and denounce climate moderates as nefarious communists belies not a willful ignorance so much as a recognition of the issue’s real scope.

Klein’s very premise will elicit scoffs from some modern environmentalists, many of whom see in capitalism history’s most efficient engine of social change. Indeed there has been massive growth in renewable energy investment and deployment in the past two decades, and — perhaps tellingly — Klein does not take down clean tech capitalists and entrepreneurs the way she so skillfully dissects big green groups and celebrity billionaires championing their cause du jour. That’s a notable exception in a book that in its subtitle pits “capitalism vs. the climate.”

But clearly something is impeding the movement’s progress. Implicit in this book’s thesis is a battle for the future of environmentalism: Is it in basically good hands, or is the status quo broken beyond repair?

Meanwhile, the reliably right wing Daily Caller points out that among the groups who will be part of this weekends big climate demo in New York, are a number of communist, socialist, and lefty types – making this demonstration exactly like every other civil rights, women’s rights, workers rights, environmental, gay rights, anti-war, or any other kind of remotely lib-to-left demonstration of the last 80 years. A penetrating and astute observation, indeed.

Continue reading “Klein: Can Climate and Capitalism CoExist?”

Arctic Sea Ice Update

Above, Part 2 of a History of Sea Ice Exploration, from Nasa Goddard Space Flight Center. Part One is here.

Arctic sea ice continues a pattern similar to what we saw after the catastrophic 2007 collapse – two years of relative recovery, and arm waving about “global cooling” from the science denial community.

Arctic Sea Ice blog slices things a bit finer.

Arctic Sea Ice Blog:

Despite this being the second melting season that rebounds from the spectacular sea ice loss event of 2012, there have been some notable events that characterize this melting season. We may have already become used to these events, but may do well to remember that they were much rarer before 2007.

Take for instance, the Northern Sea Route that has opened up completely yet again, for the 7th year in a row. Shipping has been increasing there from year to year, and this year will probably be no different, given the following forecast for sea ice conditions in the second half of the navigation season:

Things look less easy in the Northwest Passage, where the main passage will probably remain closed again this year (after being open in 2007 and 2009-2012), although several yachts are making it through the southern route, such as Le Manguier (hat-tip to @arcticio):

But this year’s main course is the sea ice in the Laptev Sea. Literally.

In previous melting seasons we had already witnessed a pronounced retreat of sea ice in this region of the Arctic. The event was quickly dubbed ‘Laptev Bite’, because that’s what the open water grabbing its way towards the Pole looked like. But this year it’s more than a bite. It’s much wider and further into the pack, further than I have ever seen it go.

Arcticio sent me this animation that shows the progression of the retreat during August:

 

Continue reading “Arctic Sea Ice Update”

Does India’s New PM Get Climate Change?

One reason I like John Oliver is because he widens his view to include world events not usually covered in Western media, as the report above shows. India has a new leader – and this is important.

Much of the talk about fossil fuel use in the developing world centers on China – but India is going to be important in shaping earth’s atmosphere in the coming century. Recent developments paint a bit of a muddied picture.

Guardian:

India’s prime minister, Narendra Modi, reportedly will be a no-show at the United Nations climate summit this month. Could it be because he does not accept the science behind climate change?

Modi used to be a supporter for climate action. But in public remarks on two occasions in the last week, the leader of one of the fastest growing – and biggest emitting – economies appeared to express doubt about whether climate change was even occurring.

“Climate has not changed. We have changed. Our habits have changed. Our habits have got spoiled. Due to that, we have destroyed our entire environment,” the rightwing leader told students in a video Q&A,according to India Today on Friday.

Modi was also vague on global warming and its causes in an interview with The Hindu a few days earlier.

“Climate change? Is this terminology correct? The reality is this that in our family, some people are old … They say this time the weather is colder. And, people’s ability to bear cold becomes less,” he said.

“We should also ask is this climate change or have we changed. We have battled against nature. That is why we should live with nature rather than battle it,” he said.

Both sets of comments are at variance with Modi’s earlier views on climate change, set out in an e-book, published in 2011 when he was chief minister of Gujarat.

The e-book, called Convenient Action in an apparent tribute to Al Gore, frames action on climate change as a moral duty.

“Climate change is definitely affecting the future generations which, as of now, have no voice on the actions of present generation,” Modi wrote.

As Gujarat’s chief minister, he oversaw the final phases of construction of the hugely controversial Narmada dam. But he goes to great length in the e-book to promote his actions on climate change, expanding the use of solar and wind power, and switching to natural gas as fuel for vehicles.

In the book, Modi also took a swipe at climate deniers. “I remember, a few years ago, I used to read on lot of sceptic views of climate change, whether or not it was actually happening. Having been in public life, I am aware of behind-the-scene lobbying by vested interests that normally accompany any such carefully orchestrated campaigns.”

Earlier news reports suggest Modi has been a supporter of renewable energy, so there is a bit of a mixed message.

RenewEconomy:

The newly elected India government of Narendra Modi has announced a suite of initiatives for solar energy across the country that will be partly funded by a doubling of the tax on coal.

Continue reading “Does India’s New PM Get Climate Change?”

Residents Near Gas Wells Exhibit Health Symptoms

A Yale study has shown that residents who live closer to natural gas wells, including ones where fracking is used, report more upper respiratory and skin symptoms than those who live farther away from the wells. (Lynn Ischay, The Plain Dealer)

Cleveland.com:

CLEVELAND, Ohio — People who live closer to natural gas wells, including those that were drilled using “fracking,” or hydraulic fracturing, report more health symptoms than those who live farther away, according to a study reported today by Yale University researchers.

The study, which drew strong negative reaction from the oil and gas industry, was published online in Environmental Health Perspectives, a journal of the National Institutes of Health. It surveyed 492 people in 180 households with ground-fed water wells in southwestern Pennsylvania, where the concentration of natural gas extraction is very high.

Respondents, who were not asked about fracking, reported more upper respiratory and dermal (skin) symptoms over the past year when they lived less than a kilometer from a gas well, and fewer such symptoms when they lived more than two kilometers from a well. There was no such difference in other health symptoms reported in the survey, which included heart, gastrointestinal and neurological complaints, among others.

Continue reading “Residents Near Gas Wells Exhibit Health Symptoms”

Despite Overwhelming Consensus, Some Media Still Unclear on Concept

The 97 Hours of 97 Percent Consensus continue at Skeptical Science.
It appears that our work will not be done, until a new generation of journalists takes the helm.

Bless their fair and balanced hearts.

The Week:

But a consensus on climate change is yet to be reached. There are plenty of people, including scientists and politicians, who challenge the evidence used to support the concept of climate change and are concerned about the costs of the policies being introduced to tackle it. On top of this, scandals such as ‘Climategate’ have shaken the public’s faith in global warming science over the last few years. In US politics, global warming has become even more divisive than abortion, gun control and the death penalty. So can scientists and politicians ever agree?

Below, Climate denialist James Delingpole goes speechless when confronted with the role of consensus in mainstream medical practice.

ArsTechnica:

Just as fields reach a consensus about what constitutes evidence, they reach a consensus about what that evidence has demonstrated. Confusion about the potential causes of AIDS dominated the early years of the epidemic, but it took researchers only two years after the formal description of the disorder to identify a virus that infected the right cells. In less than a decade, enough evidence piled up to allow the biomedical research community to form a consensus: HIV was the causal agent of AIDS.

That doesn’t mean that every single person in the field had been convinced; there are holdouts, including a Nobel Prize winner, who continue to argue that the evidence is insufficient. Those in the field–and humanity in general—simply don’t find their arguments persuasive. We’ve since oriented public policy around what the vast majority of experts consider a fact.

Meanwhile, most recent representative scientist on the “97 percent” list, is Josh Willis of NASA, a frequent “go to” contributor to these videos.

I spoke to Josh last year in this video about the so called “pause” in global warming.(below)

Continue reading “Despite Overwhelming Consensus, Some Media Still Unclear on Concept”

Early Satellite Footage Sheds Light on Sea Ice Extent

Description:

50 years ago, NASA launched Nimbus to study Earth from space. Now, experts at the National Snow and Ice Data Center (part of CIRES), are recovering valuable data and images from old, long-lost film, and expanding their understanding of sea ice in the Arctic and Antarctic

Takeaway: Yes, there was more arctic sea ice.  And the record includes both the largest and smallest extent for Antarctic sea ice.  Big holes observed in Arctic ice. Don’t know why.