BBC Pulls Off “The Trick”- Climate-Gate Drama Scores

I mostly wanted to see if they could simplify the issue enough for a general audience, and, amazingly, they pulled it off.
It’s on Amazon Prime if you missed it.

New Scientist:

It sounds trite to say that stories will save us, especially from a threat as existential and immediate as ecological collapse. But at this crucial juncture in the climate crisis, there is increasing understanding that it isn’t enough to simply state the facts and figures: people need narratives and characters to root for, to feel the sense of urgency with which we must act and to picture the scale of the devastation if we don’t.

The challenge is: how to tell a story about climate change that will not only engage audiences, but move them to act?

The BBC has interpreted the brief literally with The Trick: a 90-minute drama of the so-called Climategate scandal of November 2009. A tranche of thousands of hacked documents and emails from the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (CRU) was circulated by climate deniers to claim that scientists were faking evidence of global warming.

At the centre of the scandal was CRU director Phil Jones, forced to defend his findings through a media firestorm and in the face of death threats (before social media made them de rigueur). The title refers to Jones’s reference in an email to a colleague about a research method or “trick”, which was taken out of context to argue that Jones was manipulating the data.

The Trick focuses on the pressure placed on Jones (Jason Watkins) to be a convincing and likeable advocate for his own research against pernicious and shadowy efforts to undermine it. With his integrity under attack, Jones must convince the public that not only can they believe his findings, the fate of humanity depends on them doing so.

But Jones, stricken and under siege, believes that the damning “hockey stick” graph of skyrocketing temperatures should speak for itself – much to the frustration of the crisis communications team (George MacKay and Jerome Flynn) sent by the university to help him shape a narrative.

Watkins gives an affecting performance of a man pushed almost to suicide in the face of sinister threats and shifting demands, as does Victoria Hamilton in her portrayal of Jones’s wife Ruth, desperate to support her husband but unsure of how to reach him. “They can’t argue with the facts,” she says. “But that’s what they do all the time,” Jones explodes.

The brutalist architecture of the University of East Anglia campus and scenes of the sweeping Norfolk coastline contribute to the sense of isolation and foreboding.

Hitc:

Professor Phil Jones was the director of the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia (UEA) at the time of the Climategate controversy in November 2009.

Played by Jason Watkins in The Trick, Professor Phil Jones faced unjust persecution following the hacking of the emails and the feature-length drama charts the exoneration of himself and science as a whole. 

Born in Redhill, Surrey in 1952, Phil Jones has dedicated his life to researching climate change and has been a part of the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at UEA since 1976. 

Over a career spanning 45 years, Phil Jones has published over 450 research papers on topics related to climate change.

Jones has held a number of roles within the CRU over the decades, beginning as a Senior Research Associate before moving on to become a Reader, Professor and later the CRU’s director.

As of 2021, Professor Phil Jones is still working at the University of East Anglia.

Following the Climategate scandal in 2009, Phil Jones resigned from his position as director of the CRU but following an inquiry into the incident, it was recommended that Jones should be reinstated. 

In July 2010, Professor Phil Jones resumed his work at the CRU with the newly created role of director of research, which he held until he resigned from the role in 2016. 

The now-69-year-old became a professional research fellow in 2017 to allow him to continue his research into climate change.

Biden: Wind Turbines are Pretty

Agree.
I had an Op-Ed in a local paper recently explaining why.

Morning Sun (Mt Pleasant, MI) Feb. 7, 2019 :

Are wind turbines beautiful?

I think so — but it’s normal for different eyes to respond differently to something new.

I happen to think turbines are beautiful additions to the landscape. But beauty is so often much more than just how something looks externally. Like the face of an old friend — it comes from the deeper story behind what we see.

Globally, 80 percent of the world’s food is produced by family farms.

As farmers get pressed harder and harder, both by the economy, and by changing weather patterns — the farm bankruptcy rate has doubled in the last five years in the upper Midwest.

Their farms get absorbed into larger farms or sold off for urban sprawl.

Communities wither. Businesses die. Children leave.

I think that’s ugly.

Continue reading “Biden: Wind Turbines are Pretty”

Gathering Data: Drilling an Ocean Site is a Big Deal

Marlo Garnsworthy has a great job, documenting data gathering at the bottom of the South Atlantic.
She’s sharing on twitter. @MarloWordyBird

Continue reading “Gathering Data: Drilling an Ocean Site is a Big Deal”

Keeping Nuclear Plants Operating

Solving the nuclear conundrum. Above, acknowledging that the US is dependent on foreign sources of Uranium, including Russia. Recycling waste proposed as an option, but I have questions. Siting issues for such a facility comes to mind.
Below, Biden administration will provide subsidies to keep existing plants from closing. I’ve posted a story about one such plant in the upper midwest, the Palisades plant in South Haven, MI.

Houston Chronicle:

The Department of Energy opened up a $6 billion fundWednesday to prevent more U.S. nuclear power plants from closing, as they seek to preserve the nation’s largest source of carbon-free electricity.

Nuclear power plants have been shutting down in recent years, as they grow more expensive to maintain and face more competition from low-cost wind and solar power, along with natural gas-fired plants.

“U.S. nuclear power plants contribute more than half of our carbon-free electricity, and President (Joe) Biden is committed to keeping these plants active to reach our clean energy goals,” Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm said in a statement.. “We’re using every tool available to get this country powered by clean energy by 2035.”

The United States has the world’s largest nuclear fleet with 93 reactors, supplying 20 percent of the nation’s power needs. Since 2012 12 nuclear plants have closed, with another seven retirements scheduled through 2025, according to the Congressional Research Service.

The fund, the Civil Nuclear Credit Program, stems from the passage of last year’s $1 trillion infrastructure bill, which contained more than $100 billion in funding for clean energy development, from hydrogen fuel to advanced batteries.

Nuclear plants that have already announced plans to close would be favored to receive funding, the Energy Department said. Companies have until May 19 to apply.

“Quick, decisive action is what we needed from the department, and that is what they have delivered,” Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.V., chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, said in a statement. “We have taken the reliability and resiliency of our nuclear fleet for granted and it is about time we acted to preserve these vital assets.” 

Holland Sentinel (Michigan):

A little more than a month away from Palisades Nuclear Plant’s retirement date, the community is in the middle of an effort to quantify the plant closure’s impact on their economy — and on the electric grid.

When the 811-megawatt plant goes offline May 31, Consumers Energy, which buys power from the Entergy-owned plant, will lose a resource that currently represents about 10 percent of Consumers Energy’s peak load capacity.

Consumers Energy plans to replace that lost capacity with a mix of investments in natural gas plants, a massive, solar energy capacity, electric system upgrades, energy efficiency programs and battery storage as part of its broader, long-term plan to wean off coal plants and go green.

The headlines of that plan are the investment in 8,000 MW of solar by 2040, with solar and wind generating 60 percent of electric capacity at that point.

Continue reading “Keeping Nuclear Plants Operating”

Natural Gas Plants Looking for Climate Friendly Pathway. Is it Possible?

Ongoing work to transform gas generator into a “green hydrogen” fueled process.
But if you have enough clean energy to create the hydrogen thru electrolysis, why not just use that?

Power Engineering:

The Long Ridge Energy Terminal Power Plant in Hannibal, Ohio is now burning a hydrogen blend following successful testing in late-March, GE and the plant’s owners said.

It’s a major step in the plant’s transition to become carbon-free. (by 2030, if all goes well)

While the 485 MW combined-cycle plant began operating commercially in October 2021, the plant conducted a successful hydrogen-blending demonstration on March 30, 2022

GE officials noted this is the first time one of the company’s H-Class gas turbines is utilizing hydrogen in a commercially operating plant worldwide.

Long Ridge Energy Terminal is powered by a GE 7HA.02 gas turbine, which can burn between 15-20% hydrogen by volume in the gas stream initially and is expected to be able burn up to 100% hydrogen over time.

For the demonstration, a 5% of blend of hydrogen was injected to the combustion system of the gas turbine. GE said further upgrades will allow the plant to burn higher percentages of hydrogen, subject to fuel availability and economics.

Continue reading “Natural Gas Plants Looking for Climate Friendly Pathway. Is it Possible?”

Yes, Eating Less Meat is Effective Climate Action

The third rail of American politics is not Social Security, it’s hamburgers.

Vox, April 22, 2022:

Over the past decade, the basic facts of how we produce meat and its harms to society — its acceleration of the climate crisis, the torture of tens of billions of animals, hazardous workplace conditions for meatpacking workers — have begun to enter the realm of public consciousness. 

That’s led, in part, to a quarter of Americans — perhaps that includes you — telling pollsters they’re eating less meat (even as US consumption rises). But in a world with a population nearing 8 billion, does one person changing how they eat even make a difference for animal welfare or the climate?

Some critics say no, arguing that putting the onus on individual consumer choice is a dangerous distraction from systemic change. “We are not going to fix the climate crisis by shaming largely powerless individuals or getting men in the west to eat more plant-based burgers; it can be fixed only through systemic change,” wrote Guardian columnist Arwha Mahdawi. In this line of thinking, policy, not personal choice, is what will ultimately move the needle.

The systemic change critics have a point. Changing corporate and governmental policy is no small feat, but it’s likely a more plausible path toward meaningfully reducing greenhouse gas emissions than the Sisyphean task of convincing one person at a time to change their lifestyle.

But one worry I have is that this mindset may be pushing things too far — to the point of dismissing the value of any individual action. And it might even obscure an obvious fact: that there’s not really a trade-off here.

Jonathan Foley, a climate scientist and executive director of Project Drawdown, a nonprofit that analyzes and advocates for climate solutions, says it’s not an either/or choice. “I just never understood that false dichotomy,” he told me. “It’s inaccurate, it’s wrong, and it leaves a lot of tools off the table. And I think it makes a lot of people feel really depressed. If our hope is tied up in the US Senate to save us, and that’s it, we’re screwed.”

It’s easy to feel exhausted thinking about all that we should do to live more sustainably, but not all actions have an equal impact. Choosing just one or two of the more impactful ones — and not worrying too much about the rest — might reduce some of that stress. And according to Project Drawdown, the two most effective individual actions are food-related: reducing food waste and eating a “plant-rich” diet — one that contains less meat and more plant-based ingredients than the typical American diet. 

Just eating a plant-rich diet will reduce more greenhouse gas emissions than if you were to install solar panels on your home, switch to an electric vehicle (or public transit), compost all of your food scraps, and reduce your plastic use, according to the group. 

“When it comes to individual action, it’s not a guilt trip — saying we’re the ones responsible for this,” Foley says. “That’s not really fully true or fair. So instead of a guilt trip, call it a power trip. We have power at the individual level.”

Encouraging individual action also gives people who want to effect change an outlet in the face of a polarized political system — one that threatens to subsume food politics into our broader culture wars. 

“If you think it’s hard to get Congress or the White House to do anything about greenhouse gas emissions from energy, try talking about beef,” Foley says. “Politicians are terrified of talking about this issue … It’s completely unreachable, even to rural Democrats. The leadership is going to come from states and cities, from culture, from movements, from influencers — it’s going to come from conversations and individual actions.” He thinks better plant-based food technology will play a role, too.

Some of this change is happening. Public schools and hospitals are serving more plant-based meals and around a dozen states have banned cages for some farmed animals. Big food companies are also phasing out cages from their supply chains while adding in more plant-based food, and the alternative protein sector is beginning to receive government funding.

Continue reading “Yes, Eating Less Meat is Effective Climate Action”

Don’t Do This: Climate Activist Burns Himself, and No One Noticed

Don’t do this.
If you’re this motivated, we need you. Call me, for God’s sake and I’ll give you something useful to do.

The Blast:

 A man set himself on fire in front of the Supreme Court building in Washington D.C. on Earth Day in what appears to be a move to protest climate change, judging by his social media posts.

The police identified the man as Wynn Bruce, 50, of Boulder, Colorado. He reportedly died of his injuries after being airlifted to a hospital following the incident. The court said through CBS News that the man set himself on fire in the plaza in front of the Supreme Court building.

Although the outlet did not disclose the man’s motivation for setting himself on fire, it appears to be due to climate change.

One user, Rebecca Field, shared a Facebook screenshot of Wynn Alan Bruce’s Facebook account, which showed him sharing a post titled “Climate Change: The Science and Global Impact.” In the comments, Wynn apparently wrote 4-1-1[fire-emoji]4/22/2022.”

Continue reading “Don’t Do This: Climate Activist Burns Himself, and No One Noticed”

New Video: TV Meteorologists Grapple with Climate Change and Extremes

Had a number of great conversations with senior TV meteorologists from across the country in the past few months, following up on an investigation I did in 2016. I wanted to know what it’s like out there, and if anything has changed for them as the intensity of the climate signal ramps up.

These folks are seasoned professionals, and over recent years, they’ve dealt with all manner of threats, bluster and blowback from conservative audiences when they bring up the obvious – that climate change has something to do with the steady stream of weather extremes that has been hammering North America in recent years.

For newer mets, the topic is “potentially taboo and even dangerous”, according to Jeff Berardelli, formerly of CBS News, now at WFLA in Tampa. Chris Gloninger at KCCI in Des Moines still shakes his head at some of the responses, but continues on educating both his audience and his fellow broadcasters.

ABC News’ Ginger Zee pointed out that almost half of Americans have had a billion dollar climate event in their own county – so they are starting to ask questions, not only about what is happening, but what they can do about it.

Continue reading “New Video: TV Meteorologists Grapple with Climate Change and Extremes”

Will Boaters Go Electric?

Anyone that has ever spent time boating will have memories of the smell of gasoline, and the sheen of oil on the water. The noise from motorboats and jetskis on a summer afternoon can spoil a perfect day on the water. In addition, mall combustion engines are much more polluting even than autos.
Time for a disruption. Some very cool options being developed out there.