Yep—-came through fine—-and I never had the %EF%BB%BF “extra”—-also can’t remember the last time I got a 403 error message—-WP is indeed goofy today.
Loading...
I just saved the URL in a text file and notepad told me it has unicode characters (which you cannot see). So I’m trying it again with the ANSI charset. I’m interested myself whether this has been the problem. Sorry to all others for littering the thread. But it might help in future to avoid such hassle.
I will show great self-control and will power by NOT commenting on you talking about “littering” on Crock.
Loading...
Yippee!
Loading...
The operative word is could be, maybe, possible which applies to all the conclusions. It is possible the little people released a lot of methane as well.
The operative word is could be, maybe, possible which applies to all the conclusions.
Context matters. If your Aunt Patootie posted could-be/maybe/possible on a Facebook diatribe feel free to roll your eyes. It’s very different when someone with in-depth familiarity with what possibilities have already been eliminated and the known mechanisms for methane production from natural and anthropic sources.
I think I’ve developed “disgust fatigue” with all the Creationists, anti-vaxxers and AGW deniers being dismissive of those stupid (or venal) scientists who, despite working in an area at great depth for a long time, have somehow overlooked some glaringly obvious factoid someone else found on the Internet.
Also see => Shale Gas Bulletin Ireland and search for “methane”
E.g. here => Global spike in methane emissions over last decade likely due to US shale
Fossil methane is 87 times as potent as CO2.
Slides here => http://www.eeb.cornell.edu/howarth/documents/Howarth_methane-Biogeo-lecture_2019-0301.pdf
Got an access “Forbidden” message.
Remove the %EF%BB%BF at the end of the link in your browser address bar. Dunno how that got in.
I post the link again (this time with HTML tags)
=> http://www.eeb.cornell.edu/howarth/documents/Howarth_methane-Biogeo-lecture_2019-0301.pdf
Let’s see whether it’s working now.
Nope. So try as I said before. I don’t know why WP is adding garbage to the link just copy the text and paste it in your address bar.
Still nope—-???? It’s OK—-they ARE in the video, although some are hard to see.
Amazing. Here, dumbo, I’ve uploaded the file for you here => https://filebin.net/zzyf4ep12a66mbzh/Howarth_methane-Biogeo-lecture_2019-0301.pdf
Hope it’s working now.
Yep—-came through fine—-and I never had the %EF%BB%BF “extra”—-also can’t remember the last time I got a 403 error message—-WP is indeed goofy today.
I just saved the URL in a text file and notepad told me it has unicode characters (which you cannot see). So I’m trying it again with the ANSI charset. I’m interested myself whether this has been the problem. Sorry to all others for littering the thread. But it might help in future to avoid such hassle.
=> http://www.eeb.cornell.edu/howarth/documents/Howarth_methane-Biogeo-lecture_2019-0301.pdf
I will show great self-control and will power by NOT commenting on you talking about “littering” on Crock.
Yippee!
The operative word is could be, maybe, possible which applies to all the conclusions. It is possible the little people released a lot of methane as well.
WHAT T F are you talking about? What little people? The ones that come out on St. Patrick’s day?
Context matters. If your Aunt Patootie posted could-be/maybe/possible on a Facebook diatribe feel free to roll your eyes. It’s very different when someone with in-depth familiarity with what possibilities have already been eliminated and the known mechanisms for methane production from natural and anthropic sources.
I think I’ve developed “disgust fatigue” with all the Creationists, anti-vaxxers and AGW deniers being dismissive of those stupid (or venal) scientists who, despite working in an area at great depth for a long time, have somehow overlooked some glaringly obvious factoid someone else found on the Internet.