Today's view of the North Pole (#MODIS, Terra) is also really showing the sea ice rubble… pic.twitter.com/rE9BZhi10n
— Zack Labe (@ZLabe) September 8, 2016
Probably no arctic sea ice low extent record this year, but satellites show ice reduced to ragged mess.


Gee I notice the sea ice is higher than in 2012. I would still like a detailed explanation of how they come up with these figures when the sea ice satellite broke in April and has never been replaced.
Why should we waste our time when you’re done nothing but show you haven’t the slightest interest in HONESTLY TRYING TO UNDERSTAND WHAT ANYONE SAYS? Go bore someone else.
Tom, read this:
http://nsidc.org/the-drift/data-update/sea-ice-index-processing-resumed-with-dmsp-f18-satellite-data/
I provided you the same link two days ago, here:
https://climatecrocks.com/2016/09/06/compare-scientist-to-climate-denier-sea-ice-predictions/comment-page-1/#comment-86091
No doubt when the Arctic is ice free in the not so distant future you’ll blame the masters for messing with your Matrix simulation.
Tom – There is more than one “sea ice satellite”. If you really want a detailed explanation, which I have to say I rather doubt, you could do worse than start here:
https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu/climate-data/sea-ice-concentration-data-overview-comparison-table-and-graphs
If you want to see figures for a range of metrics from a range of satellites start here:
http://GreatWhiteCon.info/2016/09/the-2016-arctic-sea-ice-metric-minima/
Reblogged this on AGR Daily News Service.
Why do we continue to waste time trying to educate Master Bates, who is only here to perform his mental onanism? He says he wants “…a detailed explanation of how they come up with these figures when the sea ice satellite broke in April and has never been replaced”?
Fair enough—-but first HE needs to give US a “detailed explanation” of how he can come up with such incredibly ignorant BS. His brain obviously “broke” a long time ago, but it HAS apparently been replaced with an incredible pile of sweepings from the bottoms of the cages from his local zoo—-and they are NOT getting the job done for him.
DNFTFT, folks!!!!!
I would have thought this was a very important issue given it looks like the North Pole is basically a pile of slush rather than solid ice.
But what do I see? Meaningful discussion on an important topic? ….. No just more back and forth on Bates Bullshit.
The guy has shown time and time again that he is a complete fool who has nothing useful to contribute. And trying to convince him otherwise is a complete waste of time.
Although I don’t like the idea of censorship and I think it’s useful for people to be allowed to air a (properly researched!) alternative viewpoint I am starting to wonder if Peter should adopt some sort of usage policy for people like this who are basically doing nothing more than generating useless spam……