If you have not yet seen this, drop everything now and make time.
Comedy Central seems to have learned from John Oliver and HBO that posting bits to YouTube, instead of keeping them bottled up on their hard-to-embed-proprietery viewer, makes sense.
Oliver was hugely successful with his Bill Nye the Science Guy Climate Denier clip a few months ago. This piece by Stewart went up this morning and has 150k + views. already.
Below, see Oliver’s piece, which has over 4 million views.
Why won’t the “green” activists want to discuss the Anthropogenic Global Warming Theory (AGW-Theory)? Because they don’t know the physics, and the little they know, they don’t seem to understand? Or is it, the little they know, don’t support the theory?
Fact is, the pause in global temperature we are in today, and have been in for the last two decades, don’t look very scary at all. No rise in temperature despite record amount of CO2 going in to the atmosphere? How’s that possible? Wasn’t CO2 suppose to be this huge driver of global temperature? In fact, the temperature has started to fall .. Ain’t that special?
They were lying to you, they still are, – you would too if you would earn 22 billion US Dollars each year, wouldn’t you??
“A contextual flaw underlying the interpretation of a back-radiative greenhouse effect is identified. Real-time empirical data from a climate measurement station is used to observe the influence of the “greenhouse effect” on the temperature profiles. The conservation of heat energy ordinary differential equation with the inclusion of the “greenhouse effect” is developed, which informs us of the temperature profile we expect to see when a “greenhouse effect” is present. No “greenhouse effect” is observed in the measured data. The latent heats of H2O are identified as the only real heat-trapping phenomenon and are modelled. A discussion on the existence of universal principles is used to explain why simplistic arguments cannot be used as justification for the greenhouse effect.”
https://climateofsophistry.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/a-discussion-on-the-absence-of-a-measureable-greenhouse-effect.pdf
A paper on greenhouse gasses by a freakin’ MS ASTRONOMER on that looney-tunes website Principia Science International ?????? Where never a peer review is seen? Bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha! and LMAO and LOL.
You have GOT to be kidding us! Keep this up and I for one will be convinced that you are really just spoofing climate change deniers.
That’s it—-I’m gone—-rant on—-no one’s listening.
Great! That means you have all the mistakes and errors listed and ready to post ..
I’ll be waiting 🙂
While i wait ..
THE FOUR KNOWN SCIENTIFIC WAYS CARBON DIOXIDE COOLS EARTH’S CLIMATE
Written by Dr Pierre Latour PE on 22 Aug 2014
Experts from the ‘hard’ sciences are again revealing how climate ‘scientists’ have gotten it wrong about the role of carbon dioxide (CO2) in climate.
Dr Pierre R Latour, a renowned American Chemical Engineer, shows how four known mechanisms and three laws of nature prove why CO2 cools, not warms, our atmosphere. Moreover, it may be shown that the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the supposed world authority deferred to by governments, lacks a rigorous mathematical description for their so-called ‘greenhouse gas theory.’
CO2 Affects Several Temperatures in Different Ways
Here we develop the physics, chemistry and biology to quantify the effect of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) on Earth’s temperature. There are five mechanisms and three different temperatures involved.
Four show a small cooling effect, one warms surface and cools upper atmosphere with no net bulk effect. I am unaware of a rigorous mathematical description of the greenhouse gas theory that purports to do this and show a warming affect. After decades of research attempts, promoters cannot reduce greenhouse gas theory (GHGT) to mathematics of science and engineering.
https://roaldjlarsen.wordpress.com/the-four-known-scientific-ways-carbon-dioxide-cools-earths-climate/
Instead of making a fool out of yourself, like in the last post, list the points you claim is wrong, or in error. If you need to ask other activists, just say so.
I noticed you acknowledge the very high standard and level of honesty found at Principia Science International, something else than the “green” dishonest activists you find around at “Greenpeace, WWF., etc. That is very, very good!
So perhaps you could take this serious!?
Stunning levels of dishonesty!
Who’s responsible?
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2015/03/10/ushcn-data-tampering-update/#comment-500104
Ref.: You can read above; “More on Climate Science” And then you list;
97% of Climate Scientists Agree: Humans are Causing Global Warming
So, opinion is science now?
And, who are those climate “scientists” you are referring to? Do any of them have a name?
Study shows, there’s no such 97% agreement, – At all! In fact it’s only 0,3%
WOW! And i haven’t even started to comment on the article.
“Growing blanket” is not and has never been documented. CO2 is increasing in the atmosphere, no doubt. But it’s still not as high as it was in 1940, 41, 42, 43 and 44. But there’s no “blanket”.
Than the article say; “..climate science is some kind of a trend, and is apt to change course when those fickle scientists find something else to fixate on ..”
If you change “to fixate on” to “scam tax-money out of governments”, then it’s right. And it is a trend and a bias, just like the global cooling was a trend and a bias in the 70’s.
When it comes to the article, where it is predicted that the temperature would rise by 1,5 C. because of CO2 – That clearly didn’t happen. How could it, CO2 is a coolant in the atmosphere. Temperature trends has also been very stable with a pause in the global temperature rise for way over 18 years, and this has happen despite the huge amount of CO2 added to the atmosphere in that very same period of time. Anthropogenic Global Warming Theory (AGW-theory) has proven to be wrong, it failed miserably.
Todays pause (hiatus) is also 0,2 – 0,7 C. below the temperature in 1934.
One last, fun fact, the global temperature has started to fall.
I only commented on a small number of errors i found. It is very disappointing to read the low level of honesty in this blog. “Green” fraud got a new meaning today.
I expect this to be deleted. I know you do not like facts, you probably think it is a form of abuse.
http://www.treehugger.com/clean-technology/climate-science-circa-1956-video.html
“The self-appointed captain of the hockey team is playing solo. As Judith Curry wrote last month:
“The link between ‘defending Michael Mann is defending climate science’ seems to have been broken.”
As yesterday’s deafening silence confirms. If you’re defending Michael Mann, you’re not defending science, or defending climate science, or theories on global warming or anything else. Defending Michael Mann means defending Michael Mann – and it turns out not many people are willing to go there.”
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/09/17/the-drawn-out-mann-lawsuit-science-is-not-taking-a-stand-for-michael-mann/
LOL .. Yeah right .. Of course normal people won’t defend a dishonest activist.
This also show, the organizations “supporting” the AGW theory, are only in it for the money, like we have always said.
It’s all about the money!!
“According to NASA’s own data via Remote Sensing Systems(RSS), the world has warmed a mere .36 degrees Fahrenheit over the last 35 years (they started measuring the data in 1979).
Hardly anything to panic about; however, that does mean the world is warmer, right?
The problem with that argument is that we experienced the bulk of that warming between 1979 and 1998 . . . since then, we’ve actually had temperatures DROPPING!”
http://www.climatechangedispatch.com/new-reports-there-is-no-global-warming.html
“The problem with that argument is that we experienced the bulk of that warming between 1979 and 1998 . . . since then, we’ve actually had temperatures DROPPING!”
DROPPING? Says who?
How do you explain that the 10 hottest years on record have occurred since 2000? Or that 2014 was the hottest year ever? Or that the decline in Arctic Sea Ice that has been evident since 1979 has gone exponential in the 2000’s and 2015 looks to be headed for a new low?
I realize that you know little science, Drooldy, and are mainly a parrot of things from the denier world that you THINK are true and significant, but standing there with your pants down and saying “the sky is green” is only going to get you laughed at. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLMAOAOAOAOAOAO!
Really, you do not know who NASA is? Yes, i repeat what real science are telling us, no matter where it comes from. real science is real science. And how can i tell what is real and what is fake, bent or fudge? That is where my education kick in. I do not see the point in reinvent the wheel, i am doing my own research, but in another field. My research is ongoing, live 24/7 data model-based experiment going on 4 computers at the same time. Because most is automatic, i only need to keep an eye on it and intervene when certain incidents occur. So i have a lot of time on my hands posting science on many, many blogs, discussions and comments forums and newspapers in several countries.
No problem to get warmest year graphs to appear when you fudge the data.
https://climatism.wordpress.com/category/data-tampering/
http://dailycaller.com/2015/03/09/more-evidence-of-climate-data-tampering-by-noaa/2/
Like the data tamperers at NOAA and NASA, Phil Jones has also been a busy boy. The animation below shows how he made the 1940’s blip disappear through successive stages of data tampering.
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2015/03/12/phil-jones-removing-the-1940s-blip/
Todays temperature is 0,2 – 0,7 C. below the temperature of 1934, no not only in the US. As confirmed by data from many parts of the world, also confirmed by the levels of CO2 in the 1940 – 44 period where the level reached 440 ppmv. Historical records from the Arctic also confirm the very warm climate in the 30’s, which, of course, is the reason for the high level of CO2 in the 40’s.
Your attempts to ridicule and ad hom. is just funny. Evidence of desperation, cause you never post any real evidence that actually support your view, only childish, low level and, pardon my french, stupid attacks on my integrity. Perhaps you are thinking that it will shut me up, – it won’t!
As long as the anthropogenic global warming (AGW) theory is killing children, i will continue this work. https://roaldjlarsen.wordpress.com/de-gronne-ma-stilles-til-ansvar/
As always, if anyone can document that i have made mistakes or find empirical errors, please let me know so i can correct it.
“And how can i tell what is real and what is fake, bent or fudge? That is where my education kick in”?. LOL
I am still waiting to hear what science “education” you have gotten, Drooldy. As one who spent a career in “science education”, I see little evidence that you have any at all beyond some “looking up” and parroting of things you don’t understand.
You cite links to BS denier and conservative sites like Goddard’s and Daily Caller as “proof” of something? LOL again. And links to your site provide some of the most entertaining fractured physics ever seen on this planet. Are you sure you’re not a climate change denial spoofer?
What does it mean; “You cite links to BS denier and conservative sites like Goddard’s and Daily Caller ..”?
Is it bad? Wrong?
PS Since you didn’t answer my questions but instead went off into a corner to talk to yourself, I will ask them once again.
You said, “The problem with that argument is that we experienced the bulk of that warming between 1979 and 1998 . . . since then, we’ve actually had temperatures DROPPING!”
I asked. “How do you explain that the 10 hottest years on record have occurred since 2000? Or that 2014 was the hottest year ever? Or that the decline in Arctic Sea Ice that has been evident since 1979 has gone exponential in the 2000’s and 2015 looks to be headed for a new low?”
(There are THREE ??? in that paragraph—-three QUESTIONS that you need to answer. It’s time for you to do so—-another mindless rant from you may be the end of our “dialogue”)
“You said, “The problem with that argument is that we experienced the bulk of that warming between 1979 and 1998 . . . since then, we’ve actually had temperatures DROPPING!”
I asked. “How do you explain that the 10 hottest years on record have occurred since 2000? Or that 2014 was the hottest year ever?”
I did answer that one. What, you don’t know how to read?
I wrote “No problem to get warmest year graphs to appear when you fudge the data.” And then i posted this link; https://climatism.wordpress.com/category/data-tampering/
Ice in Arctic is doing just fine, polar bears too .. https://roaldjlarsen.wordpress.com/2014/08/18/interesting-historic-icedata/
The further i investigate, read and research the global warming swindle, one thing, one question keep popping up .. How did the leftist, dishonest, under-educated, political activists manage to fool so many for so long??
Yeah, yeah, – it’s all about the money, corruption and greed.
Now, why would they do that?
http://www.examiner.com/article/how-the-royal-society-is-cherry-picking-science-says-fellow-insider
“Some of my dearest friends harbour irrational fears about nuclear power, agricultural chemicals and anything genetically modified. They consider themselves enlightened, and since enlightened people are against these things, they are too. These beliefs are an expression of identity, just as a belief in creationism is part of the identity of a Southern Baptist.” http://objectivescience.net/intergovernmental-panel-on-climate-change-ipcc-is-not-a-scientific-organization-but-a-political-lobbying-group/
“Over 125 years GHCN v.3 unadjusted shows a trend of -0.0051 C/century. The adjusted data shows +1.48C/century.”
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015/03/16/temperature-adjustments-at-uscrn1-stations/
Global warming .. Hardly!
The prison is waiting for these swindlers ..
Another crap citation to the BS on the 23 CRN1 sites, which constitute only 4% of the total—-cherry picking, anyone?
I can’t see any citations (or science) from you .. What?
Ahh, i see, you don’t have any .. What? You only believe!?
Yes, that’s what dishonest, “green” leftists do. Isn’t that special 🙂