John Stewart on Climate March and Clueless Deniers

If you have not yet seen this, drop everything now and make time.

Comedy Central seems to have learned from  John Oliver and HBO that posting bits to YouTube, instead of keeping them bottled up on their hard-to-embed-proprietery viewer, makes sense.

Oliver was hugely successful with his Bill Nye the Science Guy Climate Denier clip a few months ago. This piece by Stewart went up this morning and has 150k + views. already.

Below, see Oliver’s piece, which has over 4 million views.

322 thoughts on “John Stewart on Climate March and Clueless Deniers”


  1. “The renowned Dr. Tim Ball debates with Canadian Green MP Elizabeth May. The debate was on CFAX 1070AM radio on Ian Jessop’s show at 1:00pm PST on March 16th 2015. This has been a long time coming since Miss May had a debate set up for last summer but could never find the time to get on the same time as Dr.Ball. Judge for yourself who is telling the truth, and who is doing any scaremongering. Callers phone in with some telling questions.”

    http://www.climatechangedispatch.com/dr-tim-ball-and-elizabeth-may-mp-engage-in-climate-debate.html


    1. The RENOWNED Tim Ball???? BWA-HA-HA-HA!!!!!

      More like the INFAMOUS Tim Ball, who is one of the biggest charlatans and fools in the denier community. Drooldy, do you EVER do anything but copy crap from your little Guidebook for Trolls? Did it ever occur to you to check on your sources? You embarrass yourself once again.


  2. “Mr. John Cook, who runs a website puzzlingly entitled Skeptical Science” (for he is not in the least sceptical of the “official” position) seems annoyed that I won the 2011 televised debate with Dr. Denniss of the Australia Institute, and has published a commentary on what I said. It has been suggested that I should reply to the commentary. So, seriatim, I shall consider the points made. Mr. Cook’s comments are in Roman face: my replies are in bold face. Since Mr. Cook accuses me of lying, I have asked him to be good enough to make sure that this reply to his commentary is posted on his website in the interest of balance.”

    http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/02/03/monckton-responds-to-skeptical-science/


  3. BOYCOTT COMPANIES THAT CONTRIBUTE TO THE AGW SWINDLE.
    Senate Committee Report Details Environmentalists’ inner Workings.
    Let’s start with a well known pc and printer producer, HP (Hewlett Packard) which supports the “green” fraud through Hewlett Foundation or the Packard Foundation, ref ..

    Apple has a shareholder, Albert Gore, who’s been the chief swindler in the “green” fraud, I urge everyone to boycott Apple products in order to cut off the funding to the swindler, Al Gore.

    https://roaldjlarsen.wordpress.com/boycott-companies-that-contribute-to-the-agw-swindle/


    1. BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!!!!! Drooldy, you are a stitch!!

      The world loves Apple products so much that no one is likely to boycott the company for ANY reason, much less your moronic scheme to “get Al Gore”, whose $30 million worth of Apple stock is .004% of the total.

      You truly are an (insane) voice in the wilderness.


  4. “The environmental movement has advanced three arguments in recent years for giving up fossil fuels: (1) that we will soon run out of them anyway; (2) that alternative sources of energy will price them out of the marketplace; and (3) that we cannot afford the climate consequences of burning them.

    These days, not one of the three arguments is looking very healthy. In fact, a more realistic assessment of our energy and environmental situation suggests that, for decades to come, we will continue to rely overwhelmingly on the fossil fuels that have contributed so dramatically to the world’s prosperity and progress.”

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/fossil-fuels-will-save-the-world-really-1426282420


    1. The WSJ ????!!!! BWA-HA-HA-HA!!!!!

      A conservative rag of a NEWSPAPER (not a scientific journal) that is totally owned by the corporations and fossil fuel interests. Anyone who relies on the WSJ for information about climate change is a fool (That’s you, Drooldy)


  5. “Then there are warmer predictions. In the wake of Hurricane Katrina, warmers, such as the Union of Concerned Scientists, made all manner of doomsday predictions about global warming and the increased frequency of hurricanes. According to the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, “no Category 3-5 hurricane has struck the United States for a record nine years, and Earth’s temperature has not budged for 18 years.”

    http://townhall.com/columnists/walterewilliams/2015/03/11/global-warming-n1967847


  6. “The most disgusting aspect of the climate change debate is the statements by many that it’s settled science. There is nothing more anti-scientific than the idea that any science is settled. Very often we find that the half-life of many scientific ideas is about 50 years. For academics to not criticize their colleagues and politicians for suggesting that scientific ideas are not subject to challenge is the height of academic dishonesty.”

    http://townhall.com/columnists/walterewilliams/2015/03/11/global-warming-n1967847/page/2


  7. “.. the use of coal halted and then reversed the deforestation of Europe and North America. The turn to oil halted the slaughter of the world’s whales and seals for their blubber. Fertilizer manufactured with gas halved the amount of land needed to produce a given amount of food, thus feeding a growing population while sparing land for wild nature.”

    Goes to show who the real environmentalists are ..

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/fossil-fuels-will-save-the-world-really-1426282420


    1. Actually, it goes to show how ignorant of science you are. You are nothing but a copy and paste moron with NO understanding of the science behind what you paste.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from This is Not Cool

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading