Blame Canada

ClimateProgress:

Canada leads the world in forest degradation, according to a new mapping project.

The project, put together by World Resources Institute, Greenpeace and multiple other groups, uses interactive maps to display forest degradation and destruction around the world between 2000 and 2013. According to WRI, more than 104 million hectares (about 401,546 square miles) — a chunk of land the group notes is three times the size of Germany — of the world’s remaining large, undisturbed forests, or Intact Forest Landscapes, were degraded in the last 13 years. The Northern boreal region of Canada, Russia and Alaska had some of the largest area of degraded forests, with the Amazon having the second-largest and the Congo basin the third.

In Canada’s tar sands region, forest fires and industrial development have destroyed or degraded almost two million acres of boreal forest since 2000, according to Peter Lee, Director of Global Forest Watch Canada. Lee told ThinkProgress in an email that Canada’s main driver of forest destruction is an “increased frequency and extent of forest fires” driven by climate change. These fires are likely converting areas that were once heavily forested into shrublands. Logging and road-building are the second-biggest causes of forest destruction and degradation, Lee said, and “massive increases in the pace and scale of energy developments, especially non-conventional oil and gas developments in northern Alberta’s tar sands region and also in north-eastern British Columbia with the shale plays,” is the third.

In order to mine for tar sands in Canada’s boreal region, swaths of boreal forest are cut down, and according to the Sierra Club, none of the land altered to make way for tar sands mining has been “certified as reclaimed” by Alberta, Canada’s government. Canada’s boreal forests serve as key breeding habitat for 292 species of protected birds, according to a June report, and tar sands development has resulted in the death of thousands of these birds.

In the end, though, the main reason Canada is the top country in terms of forest degradation is that it still has so many intact forests, Lee said. According to WRI, nearly 95 percent of the planet’s remaining large, Intact Forest Landscapes are found in boreal and tropical regions. There’s also a “lack of of political interest in conserving virgin forests” among Canada’s federal and provincial governments, Lee said.

“Most logging done in Canada is still to this day done in virgin forests,” Lee told the Edmonton Journal.

But though the world’s boreal region is experiencing the greatest forest degradation, deforestation and degradation are still major problems in the tropics. In Malaysia’s Cameron Highlands, WRI notes, forests are being cleared “at an unprecedented rate…not only for housing, shops and hotels, but also for vegetable and flower farms.” In the last decade alone, the average temperature in the region has risen 2°C. That rise could have been exacerbated by deforestation, and other regions with high rates of deforestation could experience a similar rise — one study projects that the Congo Basin could rise in temperature by 3°C by 2050, due to deforestation.

In the U.S., the Southeast is the most active region for forest generation and loss. According to WRI, the Southeast is the most heavily-forested region in the country, home to 29 percent of the country’s total forested land. Many of the region’s forests are used as crops for timber or paper production, so total forested area regularly waxes and wanes as crops are grown and harvested every five years.

Leaders of the groups that put together the mapping project say the results of should make governments take note of the dangers of forest degradation.

“Governments must take urgent action to stop IFL degradation by creating more protected areas, strengthening the rights of forest communities and other measures that protect intact forests for their economic, social and conservation values,” Christoph Thies, Senior Forest campaigner for Greenpeace International said in a statement.

The Guardian:

Canada’s carbon emissions will soar 38% by 2030 mainly due to expanding tar sands projects, according to the government’s own projections.

In a new report (pdf) to the United Nations, the Harper administration says it expects emissions of 815million tonnes of CO2 in 2030, up from 590Mt in 1990. Emissions from the fast-growing tar sands sector is projected to quadruple between 2005 and 2030, reaching 137Mt a year, more than Belgium and many other countries, the report shows.

Worse, Canada is likely under-reporting its emissions. An investigation in 2013 found that Canada’s reported emissions from its natural gas sector, the world’s third largest, could be missing as much as 212Mt in 2011 alone.

“Canada appears to have vastly underestimated fugitive emissions (leaks) from gas exploration,” possibly because of “inadequate accounting methodology ” according to the Climate Action Tracker analysis done by Germany’s Climate Analytics, the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research and Dutch-based energy institute Ecofys.

Bill McKibben, founder of the grassroots climate campaigning organisation 350.org, told the Guardian: “Who’d have imagined that digging up the tar sands would somehow add carbon to the atmosphere? That Canada watched the Arctic melt and then responded like this will be remembered by history.”

The Harper government pulled out of the Kyoto Protocol in 2011, promising instead to meet a weaker target of cutting emissions 17% by 2020, against 2005 levels. But an Environment Canada report last autumn revealed emissions would likely be 20% higher in 2020, leadingenvironment minister, Leona Aglukaq, to say “we’re getting results” when asked about the likely gap.

 

 

8 thoughts on “Blame Canada”


  1. Great South Park clip! Canada is NOT our friend and is NOT good for the environment.

    We ought to just annex Canada and make the provinces and territories our 51st. through 63rd. states. Of course, any country that can elect a fool like Harper and so eagerly support the depredations of the free marketers would probably just add to our “red state” problem, so maybe that’s not a good idea.


  2. Never forget that not that long ago, those beaver-bumpers engineered an attack on the United States by rebels intent on destroying our country. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Albans_Raid)

    And need I mention that sixty years ago, the ‘actor’ Lorne Greene insinuated himself into nearly every living room in the U.S. of A., and was he up front at all about being a Canadian intruder? Answer: He never even mentioned it.

    Does anyone actually believe that that all that civil politeness and cutesy Loonie money is naught but a ruse to lull us into a false sense of security until we lower our defenses too far? Eternal vigilance is the price.


    1. YES! A Canadian plot against our body fluids is next! Where is General Jack D. Ripper when we need him most?

      And Ted Cruz (a closet Canadian) is not screaming that we build a wall along that border! Perhaps when he is elected President, he will do an “inversion” and move the nation’s capitol (and capital) to Canada and govern from there?

      And speaking of Lorne Greene, don’t forget Justin Bieber and Howie Mandel, two more Canadians without whom the United States would collapse overnight.


  3. “Getting results” — what wonderful positivity! This “Conservative” government will, I fervently hope, be gone sometime next year. Sad to say, no other major party is prepared to actually change direction, though they will certainly try to improve on their environmental PR and ‘talk nice’, unlike Mr. Harper’s long string of minsters of “F the” environment…


  4. Where do you get this crap there are more trees in Canada now then in the 70″s take a look south cut down those trees SHIP them to England to be burned and go farther south cut down the rain forest plant palm oil trees for fuel .


    1. looney50 says “there are more trees in Canada now than in the 70″s”. He know this how? Because he has spent the last 40 years counting them? No, wait—-it’s the folks quoted in this article who have actually counted them and know what they’re talking about, not him Hmmmmm.

      He is a bit less looney with “take a look south cut down those trees SHIP them to England to be burned”. Yep, that wood pellet fuel/biomass thing is kind of dumb, so we’ll give him a small pass there.

      He closes with “….and go farther south cut down the rain forest plant palm oil trees for fuel”. He has headed south into La-La land apparently, since he would also have to go east or west a looooong way to get to Indonesia and Malaysia where most palm oil trees are grown (and mainly for edible oil, not fuel).

Leave a Reply to mbrysonbCancel reply

Discover more from This is Not Cool

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading