Rep. “Smoky Joe” Barton, (R- Exxon) gave us a remarkably vivid demonstration of the relationship between the tea party Republican congress and Big Oil, when he abjectly apologized to British Petroleum after the oil giant was ordered to make reparations for last year’s disastrous Gulf Spill.
Will there be a public apology to the climate scientists that oil toady and hero of climate denial Barton attempted to smear with a now discredited “study” of global temperature?
In 2005, Rep. Barton, was conducting a running persecution of climate scientists Michael Mann and his associates, which the Washington Post called, “a witchhunt” –
“THIS IS HIGHLY usual,” declared a spokesman for the House Energy and Commerce Committee when asked this week whether the request by committee Chairman Joe Barton (R-Tex.) for information from three climate scientists was out of the ordinary. He and his boss are alone in that view. Many scientists and some of Mr. Barton’s Republican colleagues say they were stunned by the manner in which the committee, whose chairman rejects the existence of climate change, demanded personal and private information last month from researchers whose work supports a contrary conclusion. The scientists, co-authors of an influential 1999 study showing a dramatic increase in global warming over the past millennium, were told to hand over not only raw data but personal financial information, information on grants received and distributed, and computer codes.
Alan I. Leshner, chief executive of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, said that although scientists “are used to answering really hard questions,” in his 22 years as a government scientist he never heard of a similar inquiry, which he suspects could “have a chilling effect on the willingness of people to work in areas that are politically relevant.”
Normally, the Post noted, when congress wants a scientific evaluation of a critical issue, it turns to the National Academy of Science, which was founded by Abraham Lincoln for exactly that purpose. Knowing that the National Academy was unlikely to give him the result he wanted, Barton made another plan –





