Plants use co2. Therefore, more Co2 is good. It’s one of the hardy perennials of climate denialism.
Like most generalizations, sooner or later it runs afoul of the real world.
Plants use co2. Therefore, more Co2 is good. It’s one of the hardy perennials of climate denialism.
Like most generalizations, sooner or later it runs afoul of the real world.
Greentech media has the story – the wind industry is crashing in the wake of Congress’ inability to pass a Renewable Portfolio Standard, or any kind of energy bill. As China and Europe continue to ramp up the green energy revolution, we’ve put America’s economy firmly on track to the 19th century.
“In the first half of this year, we are down 70 percent in terms of wind installation,” Bode said in introducing the report. In addition, she said, “we continue to see a drop in new manufacturing activity.” Speaking with rising passion, Bode said the U.S. had dropped to third place, behind both the European Union and China, in new wind installations. Describing the U.S. wind industry’s circumstances as “dire,” she went on to say, “We need action.”
Read it here, then write your damn rep.
I don’t watch many shows on TV other than news.
Maybe I should be watching “Glee”?
The article prominently mentions Monckton’s bizarre, paranoid ravings
In an interview published today, AP writer Steve Karnowski breaks the Monckton/Abraham dust up nationally. The article prominently mentions Monckton’s bizarre, paranoid ravings on a recent interview with the
equally bizarre Alex Jones, linked above.
“And he gave a scathing interview last month to syndicated radio talk show host Alex Jones in which he called Abraham a “wretched little man,” dismissed St. Thomas as a “half-assed Catholic Bible college” and called Dease “this creep of a president.” He also said he had been in contact with people he said were some of the school’s largest donors.
“Apparently in this Bible college lying is part of what they regard as their Christian mission,” Monckton told Jones. Monckton also complained he had received no response from the archbishop of St. Paul and Minneapolis, John Nienstedt, saying he was “probably so busy sorting out the problems with little boys that he hasn’t got time to deal with this one.”
The article failed to mention Monckton’s hilarious diatribe, in which he first accuses Abraham of “ad hominem” attack, – thusly, “So unusual is this attempt actually to meet us in argument, and so venomously ad hominem are Abraham’s artful puerilities, delivered in a nasal and irritatingly matey tone (at least we are spared his face — he looks like an overcooked prawn)…” And then there are the boasts of inventing cures for AIDS, flu, and the common cold.
This is the man that Congressional Republicans chose to be their sole “expert” witness in hearings on climate science. I love this story. Long Live “Lord” Monckton!
Abraham presentation, highly recommended, here.
VoteVets has been doing some of the best work on showing the relationship between climate, energy, and security.
Looks like it all boils down to you and me.
Great song, great cause, and that’s my little sister rockin the squeeze box and triangle.
If you’re inspired, the website to give to the United Way effort in the gulf is here.
Reposting this one originally from 2010.
Above, trailer for a film about the Solar Panels that Jimmy Carter symbollically placed on the White House, harkening to a new direction for the US economy, one in which life on earth, and the well being of the next 50,000 generations of children, had value.
The rest is history.
Americans elected a Daddy who gave them everything they wanted and asked no responsibility or sacrifice from them, opened the Treasury to enrich the wealthy, while laying increasing burdens, both economic, and environmental, on future generations.
One of Ronald Reagan’s first acts was removing solar panels from the White House.
A lot of people still believe global warming is something Al Gore cooked up in 2006 to promote his movie. The thousands of expert climate scientists whose work forms the consensus have no celebrity, no street cred with the average person. But for a lot of people, the archetypes of scientific expertise, are more popular media figures like Stephen Hawking and Carl Sagan.
This came home to me once again, when I came across a recent posting on Yahoo Answers.
“I watched a Carl Sagan doc yesterday, where the late Mr Sagan was talking about Venus and runaway greenhouse effects. Also global warming. There seems to be a lot of recent debate over whether Global warming exists, (or that there’s evidence to support claims). Why was someone as well researched and genuine as carl sagan so convinced? Im very confused.”
As part of my effort to create postings that will appeal to diverse learning styles and ways of reasoning – I offer this to, once again, make clear again how wide and deep the consensus on this issue is.