Leaving LA: A Climate Scientist’s Story

Peter Kalmus is our national conscience on climate. Met him in San Francisco about 5 years ago. Walks the talk.

Peter Kalmus in New York Times:

I am utterly devastated by the Los Angeles wildfires, shaking with rage and grief. The Altadena community near Pasadena, where the Eaton fire has damaged or destroyed at least 5,000 structures, was my home for 14 years.

I moved my family away two years ago because, as California’s climate kept growing drier, hotter and more fiery, I feared that our neighborhood would burn. But even I didn’t think fires of this scale and severity would raze it and other large areas of the city this soon. And yet images of Altadena this week show a hellscape, like a landscape out of Octavia Butler’s uncannily prescient climate novel Parable of the Sower.”

One lesson climate change teaches us again and again is that bad things can happen ahead of schedule. Model predictions for climate impacts have tended to be optimistically biased. But now, unfortunately, the heating is accelerating, outpacing scientists’ expectations.

We must face the fact that no one is coming to save us, especially in disaster-prone places such as Los Angeles, where the risk of catastrophic wildfire has been clear for years. And so many of us face a real choice — to stay or to leave. I chose to leave.

Often called L.A.’s “best kept secret,” Altadena is a quirky hamlet nestled in the foothills, hidden from all the city’s traffic snarls, where everyone seemed to know everyone. I arrived with my family in 2008 to start a post-doctorate degree in astrophysics. It felt like we’d landed in paradise: unlimited guacamole from a huge avocado tree in our backyard; flocks of green parrots squawking overhead; Caltech’s perfect lawns in Pasadena to lie on with my children, even in January.

I started worrying about climate change as a graduate student in 2006. My concerns grew stronger as the planet grew hotter. In 2012, unable to look away, I switched my career from gravitational waves to climate science, taking a job at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. I also started keeping chickens and bees (like so many of my neighbors), volunteering with local climate groups and bicycling around town to give climate talks.

But the climate crisis kept worsening, year after year. I wanted to scream from the rooftops for people to see global heating as the urgent threat that it is. I wrote articles and tweets with salty language and co-founded nonprofits for a climate app and a climate media group.

Then, in September 2020, I experienced heat exhaustion for the first time during an intense heat wave. The next day the Bobcat fire, a megafire, ignited a few miles from our neighborhood high in the Altadena foothills. In Los Angeles, neighborhoods near mountains and wild areas are in greater danger from wildfire. We prepared to evacuate, but, unlike the fires raging now, the blaze was mostly contained to wilderness areas. Still, for weeks, my family and I were enveloped in a cloud of smoke. My lungs burned and my fingers had a constant tingle.

After the Bobcat fire, Los Angeles no longer felt safe. I feared for the health of my family, and I wondered how we would evacuate if the neighborhood started to burn. In 2022, my wife was offered a job in Durham, N.C., and we moved.

2 thoughts on “Leaving LA: A Climate Scientist’s Story”


  1. Peter,
    I also share your grief having worked and lived in the area at one time. I have two parts to this comment. The first is a little acknowledgement I use in groups when working on the climate crisis. I find that I need to remind myself from time to time about what I can and cannot do. Read more here. https://skywaterearthhobie1.substack.com/publish/posts/detail/153651489?referrer=%2Fpublish%2Fposts
    The second is to ask the existential question on why we haven’t succeeded yet in moving concern to action. This is a question not of climate science, but of climate communication. The climate crisis, independent of the evidence right before our eyes, is now more political than abortion or gun control. One of my friends, Antonia Scatton, who writes at Reframing America on substack, has a very cogent post on how we can frame the LA fires. https://reframingamerica.substack.com/p/framing-the-fires

    – Hobie

    A short excerpt from Antonia…
    Establishing Our Terms:
    People’s understanding of reality is formed both by what is subject to debate and what is not. One way we get people to see reality from our perspective is by asking questions that assert that the things that we know to be true are actually true.

    For example, this debate should start with the “given” that global warming is causing instability in our climate which is driving increasingly destructive and dangerous weather.

    We should also take as “given” that human beings have created and perpetuated this problem through dependence on fossil fuels, and that fossil fuel companies bear responsibility both for creating this problem and for trying to block solutions.

    I am not saying that we don’t have to say these things out loud. We do. It’s just that we must always talk about them as widely accepted and unassailable facts. If we assert that those statements are true, what remains debatable? Not whether action should be taken, but which action should be taken and how.

    We should go on the offensive and demand to hear from Trump about what he and his administration are going to do to reduce global warming and prevent further increase in dangerous and destructive weather. And while we’re at it, let’s demand to hear from the rest of our public officials on both sides of the aisle what they’re going to do about it moving forward (while also giving appropriate credit to those who have taken action and fought for more.)

    That is what moral leadership looks like in the public debate. Why? Because in addition to asserting important things about what is true, this approach opens the door for us to connect what is happening in the news to larger themes about our values, right and wrong, and the role government should play in our society.

    By making it about our values, we explain why it is legitimate for us to expect and demand that Trump and our political leaders take more action to reduce global warming.

    (She then goes on.) How to frame this debate: …


  2. Peter I think your warnings are about to be heard. With the new president and his push to destroy the planet I feel most cannot deny what’s happening to them as systems breakdown and the cost of living skyrockets caused by climate change.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from This is Not Cool

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading