Climate change was showing up as a frequent question in Townhall meetings that terrorized Republicans following Donald Trump’s election.
It was a harbinger of climate’s emergence this year as a top-of-mind issue for voters, if not ever-clueless mainstream journalists.
With his recent announcement that he had actually read the Mueller report, Rep. Justin Amash, from Michigan’s 3rd Congressional District, came out in favor of impeaching Donald Trump – the first GOP representative to do so.
May it be a wave.
Meanwhile however, good to remember that on other issues, the honorable Rep is still mired in primordial goo. Skip to about 1:30 if you want to avoid the nice lady’s long winded question.
Now that he’s done with the Mueller report, Rep. Amash might take time to read the IPCC report.
Below, the video I made on the flurry of Townhall queries includes my own attempt to pin down a squirmy Republican denier.
I read both, both are great fictional readings.
So where do you get your information, like the gem “Miami floods because it is subsiding”?
Which do you disagree with?
– CO2 is a greenhouse gas
– fossil fuels are extracted from the ground and combusted into the atmosphere
– the Keeling Curve measures the increasing CO2 in the atmosphere
– Historic CO2 levels have been measured in ice cores and preserved leaves
– the arctic is heating up faster than mid-latitudes (as predicted)
Be specific, lest we think you are a doubt-mongering troll.
Fictional? Our resident Moran speaks again!
https://me.me/i/brain-moran-go-usa-tea-party-if-you-think-their-1494209
Sorry—bad link—-try this:
https://me.me/embed/i/14942097
So please provide the data and documentation you personally accumulated that proves either to be incorrect.
Even Exxon’s own data analysis from the 70’s and 80’s agree with the IPCC. Funny how that happens!