Chris Mooney in the Washington Post:
A hundred years from now, humans may remember 2014 as the year that we first learned that we may have irreversibly destabilized the great ice sheet of West Antarctica, and thus set in motion more than 10 feet of sea level rise.
Meanwhile, 2015 could be the year of the double whammy — when we learned the same about one gigantic glacier of East Antarctica, which could set in motion roughly the same amount all over again. Northern Hemisphere residents and Americans in particular should take note — when the bottom of the world loses vast amounts of ice, those of us living closer to its top get more sea level rise than the rest of the planet, thanks to the law of gravity.
The findings about East Antarctica emerge from a new paper just out in Nature Geoscience by an international team of scientists representing the United States, Britain, France and Australia. They flew a number of research flights over the Totten Glacier of East Antarctica — the fastest-thinning sector of the world’s largest ice sheet — and took a variety of measurements to try to figure out the reasons behind its retreat. And the news wasn’t good: It appears that Totten, too, is losing ice because warm ocean water is getting underneath it.
“The idea of warm ocean water eroding the ice in West Antarctica, what we’re finding is that may well be applicable in East Antarctica as well,” says Martin Siegert, a co-author of the study and who is based at the Grantham Institute at Imperial College London.
AUSTIN,Texas — Researchers at The University of Texas at Austin’s Institute for Geophysics (UTIG) in the Jackson School of Geosciences have discovered two seafloor gateways that could allow warm ocean water to reach the base of Totten Glacier, East Antarctica’s largest and most rapidly thinning glacier. The discovery, reported in the March 16 edition of the journal Nature Geoscience, probably explains the glacier’s extreme thinning and raises concerns about how it will affect sea level rise.
Totten Glacier is East Antarctica’s largest outlet of ice to the ocean and has been thinning rapidly for many years. Although deep, warm water has been observed seaward of the glacier, until now there was no evidence that it could compromise coastal ice. The result is of global importance because the ice flowing through Totten Glacier alone is sufficient to raise global sea level by at least 11 feet, equivalent to the contribution of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet if it were to completely collapse.
“We now know there are avenues for the warmest waters in East Antarctica to access the most sensitive areas of Totten Glacier,” said lead author Jamin Greenbaum, a UTIG Ph.D. candidate.
The ice loss to the ocean may soon be irreversible unless atmospheric and oceanic conditions change so that snowfall outpaces coastal melting. The potential for irreversible ice loss is due to the broadly deepening shape of Totten Glacier’s catchment, the large collection of ice and snow that flows from a deep interior basin to the coastline.
“The catchment of Totten Glacier is covered by nearly 2½ miles of ice, filling a sub-ice basin reaching depths of at least one mile below sea level,” said UTIG researcher Donald Blankenship.
Greenbaum and Blankenship collaborated with an international team from the United States, Australia, the United Kingdom and France.
Because much of the California-sized interior basin lies below sea level, its overlying thicker ice is susceptible to rapid loss if warm ocean currents sufficiently thin coastal ice. Given that previous work has shown that the basin has drained its ice to the ocean and filled again many times in the past, this study uncovers a means for how that process may be starting again.
“We’ve basically shown that the submarine basins of East Antarctica have similar configurations and coastal vulnerabilities to the submarine basins of West Antarctica that we’re so worried about, and that warm ocean water, which is having a huge impact in West Antarctica, is affecting East Antarctica, as well,” Blankenship said.
The deeper of the two gateways identified in the study is a three-mile-wide seafloor valley extending from the ocean to beneath Totten Glacier in an area not previously known to be floating. Identifying the valley was unexpected because satellite analyses conducted by other teams had indicated the ice above it was resting on solid ground. Special analysis of ice-penetrating radar data shows the bottom of the ice over the valley is smoother and brighter than elsewhere in the area — tell-tale signs that the ice is floating and being eroded by the ocean.
“Now we know the ocean is melting ice in an area of the glacier that we thought was totally cut off before,” Greenbaum said. “Knowing this will improve predictions of ice melt and the timing of future glacier retreat.”
“It’s only one glacier, but it’s changing now and it is significant for sea levels globally,” said study co-author Professor Martin Siegert, Co-Director of the Grantham Institute at Imperial College London. “The 3.5 metre rise may take several centuries to complete, but now the process has started it is likely irreversible. This is another example of how human-induced climate change could be triggering major changes with knock-on impacts that will be felt globally.”
The East Antarctic Ice Sheet was previously thought to be surrounded by colder water and so relatively stable compared to the smaller West Antarctic Ice Sheet, which is losing more than 150 cubic kilometres of ice each year. However, satellite data have shown that the Totten Glacier has also been thinning considerably. To investigate why, the team of researchers surveyed the area.
Using radar and other geophysical techniques, they obtained a map of the topographical landscape underlying the glacier where it met the sea. Their results revealed a 5 km-wide valley running underneath the glacier capable of letting warm ocean water reach the ice base.
Thin ice at the margins of ice sheets can float on the ocean, but the ice inland is ‘grounded’ and in contact with the bedrock. The newly-discovered valley allows warm ocean water to flow underneath a region of floating ice, exposing the grounded edge of the ice sheet to the warmth and leading to glacier melting.
Destabilisation of the Totten Glacier could leave more ice inland vulnerable to change, said Professor Siegert: “Once a certain region starts to change, the implications for the connected ice are potentially significant. We are using computer modelling to understand whether changes in Totten Glacier could lead to changes in both adjacent and more distant places in Antarctica. While this work needs to be undertaken, the change at Totten Glacier itself is significant and concerning.”
There are still many unknown landscapes beneath the Antarctic ice, and Professor Siegert and his colleagues are planning to map even more remote regions in an effort to understand the dynamics of the continent. These include two ‘poles of ignorance’ – spots on Antarctica where you can stand and be at least 200km from the nearest data point relating to the continent beneath the ice.


Reblogged this on jpratt27.
Interesting to hear this about Totten Glacier in East Antarctica. I’ve been hearing about a similar situation for years now at Pine Island Glacier in West Antarctica. I’ve always wondered if a glacier “plug” collapses suddenly, just how quickly could sea levels rise? I recommend this documentary on Youtube:
Earth Under Water in Next 20 Years
I began my day by reading Mooney’s article in the WashPost. Is there NO good news anywhere?
You need to look on the bright side. This could be excellent news for big wave surfing enthusiasts for a long, long time.
Ginger, I’m a surfer. I used to dream of new breaks opening up as the sea-level rose; however, it recently occurred to me that with sea-level rise comes ocean waters inundating cities and industrial centers. That means that all the crap (oils, chemicals, and other shit people just dump on the ground because they are too lazy to dispose of it properly) held on the dry ground will now go into the ocean. I’m not sure surfers would want surf in that soup. I wouldn’t.
Chemicals be worth it tho, if you can surf a pipe through the stone columns of the Capital building, or slalom between the suspension cables of the Golden Gate Bridge.
dOg doesn’t do Bright-Side.
It’s true that I don’t “do bright-side” when the bright-side is the reality denying, scientifically ignorant, and mindless wishful thinking that we see all too often (and even on Crock a bit).
I do not, however, view the surfer’s quest for “good news” in the form of the “big wave” to be mindless bright-sidedness. It’s more in the vein of “Eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow we die” and “Carpe Diem”—-for surfers, that would be
“Life’s a wave”.
I don’t surf, but when the waters start lapping on my back yard, I might take a few casts and see what’s biting. (In view of what David J. said about the “soup” that is likely to be inundating us, I won’t eat whatever I catch, though—-unless everything has collapsed and I’m starving).
All of life is “the dark side.”
Although it will not be due to AGW, Homo sapiens eventually goes extinct in great pain and misery no matter what we do.
Does it really matter why? Or whether that’s in 4K or 4M years? Or to some poor schmuck and his family 4 billion years from now?
The reality is that we almost certainly have several decades left of this once-in-an-Earthtime experiment –– of continuously rising CO2, taking measurements, refining the science, improving the models, watching temps and sea level rise.
The only “bright side” is that if Inhofe, Limbaugh, Monckton, et.al. live to an average life-expectancy we can say “Told you so” before all of their heads explode.
But in all cases, this pale blue dot looks the same from there.
Think you are right on that …. With cyclone Pam rolling in our locality recently, the local civil defense were warning citizens to have 3 days food and water handy and tarpaulin in case of windows damage etc. To my surprise the local beaches were a throng with happy surfers on their boards, gayly (in the old sense of the word – I hope) riding the waves, oblivious to warnings to stay home.
The Totten Glacier could lock in five meters (sixteen feet) of sea level rise, or roughly as much as all of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet combined:
From the paper:
University of Texas : “The ice loss to the ocean may soon be irreversible unless atmospheric and oceanic conditions change so that snowfall outpaces coastal melting”
Interesting on the same day as this report was released by the universities in Austin, Texas and London, U.K , another was published in the journal Nature Climate Change from the Potsdam Institute and Oregon state University (with others), it is very satisfying to see these esteemed bodies working together.
The Potsdam reports that increased temperature paradoxically causes increased snowfall and will help to slow down the inevitable melt some, giving us valuable time to take action. Whether you accept mankind has exacerbated the melt or not, you surely cannot deny the evidence and urgency of dealing with sea level rise, or can you?
“Warmer air transports more moisture and hence produces more precipitation – in cold Antarctica this takes the form of snowfall,” lead author Katja Frieler explains. “We have now pulled a number of various lines of evidence together and find a very consistent result: Temperature increase means more snowfall on Antarctica,” says Frieler. “For every degree of regional warming, snowfall increases by about 5 percent.”
https://www.pik-potsdam.de/news/press-releases/global-warming-brings-more-snow-to-antarctica
http://oregonstate.edu/ua/ncs/archives/2015/mar/study-past-warming-increased-snowfall-antarctica-affecting-global-sea-level
I recall there was a National Research Council committee with a distinguished board (including Professors D.Archer and R.B Alley) who published an excellent report “Abrupt Impacts of Climate Change: Anticipating Surprises “ and it recommended a Climate Tipping Point Early Warning System was set up. This was end of 2013.
I have not yet heard of the EWS being in effect, but this latest news must merit it (and urgently too). My understanding is that the IPCC concentrated on the Western Antarctic and assumed the East was much more stable over the next few centuries or this millennium.
This Potsdam paper also discusses an EWS, and even if we are not sure that we could recognise if a tipping point is approaching or past, it’s high time we tried.
“We exclude from the map systems (of Earth Climate Tipping points) in which any threshold appears inaccesable this century (e.g East Antarctic Ice Sheet) or the qualitative change would appear beyond this millennium”
http://www.pik-potsdam.de/~stefan/Publications/Journals/lenton_etal_PNAS_2008.pdf