Melt Season’s First Signs in Arctic

Andrew Freedman in Climate Central:

Following more than two decades of Arctic sea ice thinning and melting, an unusual event just weeks before the start of the spring melt season is providing visual proof of how vulnerable the ice pack really is.

During the end of February and continuing into early March, large fractures in the sea ice were observed off the north coast of Alaska and Canada, from near Ellesmere Island in the Canadian Arctic to Barrow, Ala., the northernmost city in the U.S.

The rapid climate change in the Arctic and sharp decline of sea ice has been attributed to manmade global warming, along with natural climate variability, and projections show the region becoming seasonally sea ice free by midcentury.

According to the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) in Boulder, Colo., this fracturing event appears to be related to a storm that passed over the North Pole on Feb. 8, 2013, creating strong off-shore ice motion. The event is unusual but not unheard of, as similar patterns were seen in early 2011 and 2008. However, the NSIDC said the fracturing this time is more extensive.

The spread of the ice fractures can be seen in a video animation from satellite imagery, provided by the NSIDC.

The NSIDC said the fracturing is likely a sign of the prevalence of young and thin sea ice, which can be disturbed more easily by weather patterns and ocean currents, and also melts more easily when exposed to warm air and ocean temperatures during the melt season. As Arctic sea ice extent has plummeted since 1979, down to a record low in September 2012, first-year ice has become much more common across the Arctic, as thick, multiyear ice has declined.

“The large area of fractured ice is located in predominantly first-year ice, which is thinner and easier to fracture than thick, multiyear ice,” the NSIDC said on its website.

Arctic Sea Ice Blog:

For instance last year at the start of February I wrote about the spectacular lack of ice in the Kara and Barentsz Seas, notably around Novaya Zemlya. I had a hunch that this was pretty much unprecedented during the satellite era and said as much in a guest post for Climate Progress. I was mildly criticized for it by the NSIDC’s Walt Meier via Climate Central (and I will never forgive him for it 😉 ). Now the hunch turned out to be reasonably correct – although there had been a similar retreat of ice at a later date in 2011, caused by wind patterns – but I didn’t invest the time to make sure it was.

This year things are calm in the Kara and Barentsz Seas. At the surface that is, with not even a breeze towards the coast to show how strong or weak the ice is. But as usual, when it’s calm on one side of the Arctic, something is going on on the other side. Some commenters have been keeping a sharp eye on this, and I think it now merits a blog post of its own, if only because of the possible implications this event might have for the ice pack once the melting season gets underway. And it’s big time spectacular.

Last week, on February 22nd commenter A-Team – who has really been animating the blog lately, figuratively and literally speaking – made the animation you see on top of the post, showing massive cracking in the Beaufort Sea. In the following days fellow commenter Jim Hunt picked up on that and wrote a blog post on his Econnexus blog called Arctic Sea Ice is Cracking Under the Strain with a spectacular image of the ice pack in the Beaufort Sea on February 27th.

Meanwhile over on the Arctic Sea Ice Forum commenter BornFromTheVoid remarked that a similar thing occured last year in April. A-Team was quick to turn that event into an animation (that I had to edit a bit to cut down on size):

According to A-Team: “If taken as a simplistic predictor of the 2013 melt season, we are 51 days ahead of last season.”

The fact that the ice lets itself be pulled so willingly into the Beaufort Gyre so early in the year, with the start of the melting season still some 4 weeks off, is a sure sign that it’s thin. This, of course, is a very bad prelude to the melting season, even if there are a couple of weeks left for the ice to thicken. Those huge cracks will freeze over, but the ice will be very brittle and the first to go, probably creating open spaces between multi-year ice floes where the Sun will shine and quickly heat things up. Unless the cloud cavalry comes to the rescue. Like A-team says: “Beginning of the end, end of the beginning, or just a bad hair day for the ice pack — we’ll have to wait and see.”

UPDATE:

Arctic Sea Ice Blog:

This image was posted yesterday by Chris Reynolds from the Dosbat blog:

leads

To recapitulate: It is normal for the ice to crack and for leads to occur. However, this is very extensive cracking and there are some very big leads, and all of it seems to come earlier than expected. Given last year’s melting mayhem and the low amount of multi-year ice, it makes one wonder whether this early cracking will have any effect in the melting season to come.

There are still several weeks to go before this part of the Arctic is going to start melting, up till then the ice will actually thicken some more, even when the Sun’s rays start to reach the ice. But the ice is already getting broken up in smaller pieces, which means that 1) the pack becomes more mobile (like we saw last year), and 2) the thin ice that now grows to fill up the leads, will go first when the melting starts, potentially leading to more open water between floes to absorb solar energy and convert it to heat.

But maybe not. Maybe this will have zero influence. We don’t know. That’s why we watch.

28 thoughts on “Melt Season’s First Signs in Arctic”


  1. The 5 day forecast for the Arctic is for an exceptional high pressure system to set up with pressures of 1065 Mb over the North Pole and temperatures over Baffin Bay expected to reach about 40 C. above normal.

    Neven has some new discussion of this today:

    http://neven1.typepad.com/blog/2013/03/crack-is-bad-for-you-and-sea-ice.html

    And WU commenter Tom Taylor expresses his amazement at the forecasts in Comment #493 here: http://tinyurl.com/argwczk

    Quoting Tom Taylor: “I still can’t get over the ridiculous blocking that will be taking place over Greenland and the Arctic region.

    Below I have posted the 5-day GFS 250mb jet forecast. Generally speaking, the jet should flow from west to east. In the image I posted below, the jet is seen flowing from the southern tip of Greenland backwards across Canada, over the north pole into northern Russia and then back across the pole where it shoots back down along the eastern side of Greenland and across Iceland. This is the most ridiculously amplified configuration I have ever seen.”

    It’s a brave new world out there….


      1. What’s surprising me at present is just how eventless the past couple of months have been weatherwise.

        It’s nice to not be setting any unprecedented records recently. In particular, I keep an eagle eye out for the sort of economic catastrophes that hit NY/NJ with the freakish Superstorm Sandy. Lining too many of these type events up back to back can really condemn a society to a grim fate.

        And then there’s the alternative, when it’s not the high water but the hell that’ll getcha:

        http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175661/tomgram%3A_william_debuys%2C_exodus_from_phoenix/


  2. It would be more dramatic if we had a milage scale under the graphics. From your description, the area is quite large. This is indeed worrying, considering the ice should be at its thickest right now, just before the sun returns to the north pole.


      1. That area is ginormous… It is more than halfway across toward Greenland! Even if those shards don’t break up and get moved away, the lower albedo of the water in between them will greatly accelerate the melting.

        We continue to see quicker and quicker degradation in the Arctic ice, than even the increasingly serious projections show…

        Neil


  3. I knew it was a bad idea to start daylight savings time earlier! All that extra sunlight…. ( it would not surprise me to hear that argument from the ‘skeptics’ )


  4. The rapid climate change in the Arctic and sharp decline of sea ice has been attributed to manmade global warming, along with natural climate variability […]

    Looks to me like someone’s still in denial.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from This is Not Cool

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading